Maveric Test Automation
[custom_breadcrumb]

Still stuck at 33% coverage?

It’s not the tools. Two thirds of every bank release still runs manually and has for a decade. The ceiling is an operating model problem. We know exactly how to break it.

Book an Assessment

Why Automation stalls? Your last fix
didn't stick. Here's the real reason.

Most programmes tried a new tool, a larger team, or a framework migration. None produced sustained coverage growth, because they addressed symptoms, not the seven structural root causes.

ai-card

Fragmented Operating Model

Built per-project, not enterprise-wide. Coverage resets with every programme end.

ai-card

Talent Concentration Risk

One or two engineers own the entire estate. When they leave, it degrades fast.

ai-card

Test Data Dysfunction

Production data off-limits. Synthetic data underfunded. Environments always contended.

ai-card

Wrong Automation Candidates

UI tests break constantly. The real value - API and business-process - is under-automated.

ai-card

Script Brittleness

30-40% of QE bandwidth on maintenance. Nothing left for new coverage.

ai-card

Isolated from CI/CD

Batch-mode suites can't gate releases. Automation that doesn't run continuously can't do its job.

ai-card

Legacy Platform Exclusion - Temenos, Finastra, FLEXCUBE

Core banking sits almost entirely outside the automated perimeter. Automate 80% of digital channel tests and you may still only reach 40% total coverage.

OUR APPROACH

Five pillars. Not in sequence - together.

Organizations that break through 33% treat automation as an engineering discipline embedded across the delivery lifecycle, not a downstream QA phase.

Embedded Automation

In every sprint from day one. Coverage compounds continuously - never resets.

Reusable Process-Aligned Assets

Pre-built libraries for KYC, Faster Payments, SWIFT, Open Banking. Not rebuilt per programme.

Low-Code Accelerators

Functional testers build automated cases directly. Coverage scales beyond engineering headcount.

AI-Enabled Maintenance

Self-healing scripts cut maintenance from 30-40% of QE bandwidth to under 15%.

Pipeline-Native Execution

Gates releases on every build - including Temenos and Finastra layers never previously automated.

The Maveric Edge

The-Maveric-Edge-Tablular

What changes when coverage doubles
Delivery economics, not just quality metrics.

60%+

Automation Coverage

Up from the industry 33% average in 12-18 month

70%

Reduction in Manual Effort

QE team freed for exploratory, edge-case, and strategic work

5× faster

Regression Cycles

From 3-6 weeks to 5-10 days, enabling continuous releases

< 70%

Maintenance Overhead

Self-healing and process-aligned libraries cut script upkeep dramatically

100%

Pipeline Integration

Every build gated by automated evidence, including legacy core banking layers

Audit-ready

Release Confidence

Quantifiable, auditable coverage metrics - not individual tester judgement

contact

Breaking the 33% Ceiling

How banking enterprises can industrialize test automation and scale to 60%+ coverage

What’s inside the whitepaper

  • Why 33% is a structural ceiling – not a resourcing problem
  • Seven root causes and how they compound each other
  • The five-pillar industrialization model in full
  • What changes operationally when coverage doubles
  • Automating Temenos, Finastra, and legacy core banking layers
  • The Coverage Assessment – scope, deliverables, ROI modelling

Download the Whitepaper

contact

Share your details to book your coverage assessment, today.